<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 270 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203741</link>
    <description>In an appeal concerning Cenvat credit recovery on inputs after the final product became exempt, the High Court noted that the revenue&#039;s proposed substantial questions of law arose in a dispute involving only a nominal amount. Applying discretionary judicial restraint in trivial monetary matters, it declined to examine or decide the substantive Cenvat issues and disposed of the appeal without adjudication on those questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 270 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203741</link>
      <description>In an appeal concerning Cenvat credit recovery on inputs after the final product became exempt, the High Court noted that the revenue&#039;s proposed substantial questions of law arose in a dispute involving only a nominal amount. Applying discretionary judicial restraint in trivial monetary matters, it declined to examine or decide the substantive Cenvat issues and disposed of the appeal without adjudication on those questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>