<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 10 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203738</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing the assessee&#039;s claim under Section 10B for the assessment years in question. The Tribunal emphasized the fulfillment of conditions by the assessee as an export-oriented unit engaged in manufacturing activities, dismissing objections regarding job work by sister concerns. The decision supported the assessee&#039;s eligibility for the exemption under Section 10B, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the allowance of the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 10 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203738</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing the assessee&#039;s claim under Section 10B for the assessment years in question. The Tribunal emphasized the fulfillment of conditions by the assessee as an export-oriented unit engaged in manufacturing activities, dismissing objections regarding job work by sister concerns. The decision supported the assessee&#039;s eligibility for the exemption under Section 10B, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the allowance of the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>