https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203735 Imported goods found to be in breach of import policy and labelling requirements were liable to confiscation, and confiscated goods do not carry any automatic right of re-export merely because the importer claims title. In the absence of a statutory provision authorising re-export after confiscation, the request for re-export was rejected. The operative effect was that the order permitting re-export could not stand, and the confiscation consequence remained intact for goods imported in violation of import conditions. en-us Fri, 06 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203735 Imported goods found to be in breach of import policy and labelling requirements were liable to confiscation, and confiscated goods do not carry any automatic right of re-export merely because the importer claims title. In the absence of a statutory provision authorising re-export after confiscation, the request for re-export was rejected. The operative effect was that the order permitting re-export could not stand, and the confiscation consequence remained intact for goods imported in violation of import conditions. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 06 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203735