<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 202 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reimbursement of withholding tax paid by Tata Elxsi was not subject to disallowance under section 40(a)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal concluded that the amount reimbursed to Tata Elxsi was not considered as tax on income for disallowance under the provision, as it was the income of the non-resident payable as tax to the Indian Government. Therefore, the special effect expenditure claimed by the assessee was allowed, and the disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 202 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reimbursement of withholding tax paid by Tata Elxsi was not subject to disallowance under section 40(a)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal concluded that the amount reimbursed to Tata Elxsi was not considered as tax on income for disallowance under the provision, as it was the income of the non-resident payable as tax to the Indian Government. Therefore, the special effect expenditure claimed by the assessee was allowed, and the disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>