https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203727 The Court dismissed the petition, holding the petitioner liable to pay service tax as the service provider in a construction contract. It declined to enforce a resolution for tax payment or interfere in contractual matters, advising the petitioner to seek remedies through proper legal channels. The Court emphasized that the respondent's obligation to pay service tax cannot be enforced without a contractual provision and directed the matter to be resolved in a competent court based on evidence and contractual terms. en-us Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203727 The Court dismissed the petition, holding the petitioner liable to pay service tax as the service provider in a construction contract. It declined to enforce a resolution for tax payment or interfere in contractual matters, advising the petitioner to seek remedies through proper legal channels. The Court emphasized that the respondent's obligation to pay service tax cannot be enforced without a contractual provision and directed the matter to be resolved in a competent court based on evidence and contractual terms. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203727