<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 457 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203724</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The ITAT found the assessee&#039;s explanation for the non-disclosure of income to be bona fide, with all material facts disclosed. The penalty was deemed unjustified, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and absolving the assessee of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 457 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203724</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The ITAT found the assessee&#039;s explanation for the non-disclosure of income to be bona fide, with all material facts disclosed. The penalty was deemed unjustified, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and absolving the assessee of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>