<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 197 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203693</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed due to the appellants&#039; failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement set by the Tribunal. Despite several opportunities and legal proceedings, the appellants did not adhere to the conditions specified in the stay order, leading to the dismissal of appeals in 2007. Subsequent hearings and specified deposit amounts were provided, but the appellants again failed to comply within the given timeframe. The Tribunal emphasized that no new evidence or developments were presented to warrant a reconsideration of the waiver of pre-deposit, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the appeals for non-compliance with the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 197 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203693</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed due to the appellants&#039; failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement set by the Tribunal. Despite several opportunities and legal proceedings, the appellants did not adhere to the conditions specified in the stay order, leading to the dismissal of appeals in 2007. Subsequent hearings and specified deposit amounts were provided, but the appellants again failed to comply within the given timeframe. The Tribunal emphasized that no new evidence or developments were presented to warrant a reconsideration of the waiver of pre-deposit, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the appeals for non-compliance with the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>