<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 444 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal against the demand of service tax, denial of CENVAT credit, and penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant was granted the CENVAT credit availed by them prior to registration and was exempted from penalties under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 due to a lack of prior knowledge of their service tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 444 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal against the demand of service tax, denial of CENVAT credit, and penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant was granted the CENVAT credit availed by them prior to registration and was exempted from penalties under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 due to a lack of prior knowledge of their service tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>