<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 346 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203683</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad confirmed a service tax demand of Rs. 1,83,799 against the appellant for short payment of service tax related to mandap keeper services and commission received for business auxiliary services. Penalties under Section 76 and Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were imposed despite the appellant&#039;s arguments for penalty reduction and against the imposition of penalties under both sections. The Tribunal held that statutory payment timelines could not be condoned, leading to the affirmation of penalties on 24-12-2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 346 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203683</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad confirmed a service tax demand of Rs. 1,83,799 against the appellant for short payment of service tax related to mandap keeper services and commission received for business auxiliary services. Penalties under Section 76 and Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were imposed despite the appellant&#039;s arguments for penalty reduction and against the imposition of penalties under both sections. The Tribunal held that statutory payment timelines could not be condoned, leading to the affirmation of penalties on 24-12-2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>