<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 509 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203668</link>
    <description>In a classification dispute over products claimed as instant food mix, the Tribunal applied the common parlance test and found the goods, on the available material, to consist of minerals and vitamins rather than products known as food or food mix. It held that no prima facie case was made out for complete waiver of the duty demand, so the appellants were required to deposit the duty amount. On the penalty aspect, the show cause notice did not specifically refer to Section 11AC, and the appellants were held to have a prima facie case for waiver of interest and penalty pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 509 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203668</link>
      <description>In a classification dispute over products claimed as instant food mix, the Tribunal applied the common parlance test and found the goods, on the available material, to consist of minerals and vitamins rather than products known as food or food mix. It held that no prima facie case was made out for complete waiver of the duty demand, so the appellants were required to deposit the duty amount. On the penalty aspect, the show cause notice did not specifically refer to Section 11AC, and the appellants were held to have a prima facie case for waiver of interest and penalty pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>