<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 266 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203662</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the denial of cenvat credit for service tax demand based on suppression of facts, citing impracticality in moving tower without damage for signal transmission, and lack of evidence supporting financial difficulty for pre-deposit waiver. Appellants were directed to deposit the demanded amount within twelve weeks, with penalty waiver pending appeal resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 266 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203662</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the denial of cenvat credit for service tax demand based on suppression of facts, citing impracticality in moving tower without damage for signal transmission, and lack of evidence supporting financial difficulty for pre-deposit waiver. Appellants were directed to deposit the demanded amount within twelve weeks, with penalty waiver pending appeal resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>