<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 342 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203661</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi granted a stay of recovery of cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 60,51,237/- along with interest and penalty pending appeal. The Tribunal considered Circular No. 122/3/2010-S.T., which clarified that partial payment by the service recipient does not justify denying Cenvat credit if the service provider has discharged the entire duty. This interpretation led to the waiver of the demanded amount, emphasizing the importance of aligning payment and duty discharge in determining cenvat credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 342 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203661</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi granted a stay of recovery of cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 60,51,237/- along with interest and penalty pending appeal. The Tribunal considered Circular No. 122/3/2010-S.T., which clarified that partial payment by the service recipient does not justify denying Cenvat credit if the service provider has discharged the entire duty. This interpretation led to the waiver of the demanded amount, emphasizing the importance of aligning payment and duty discharge in determining cenvat credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>