<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 251 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203660</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the demand for duty and interest while setting aside the penalty, ruling against considering GTA services for outward transportation as input service in the context of the appellant&#039;s transactions. The judgment highlighted the nuanced interpretation of input services, place of removal, and the impact on assessable value, ultimately providing clarity on the eligibility of cenvat credit for GTA services in similar scenarios.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 251 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203660</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the demand for duty and interest while setting aside the penalty, ruling against considering GTA services for outward transportation as input service in the context of the appellant&#039;s transactions. The judgment highlighted the nuanced interpretation of input services, place of removal, and the impact on assessable value, ultimately providing clarity on the eligibility of cenvat credit for GTA services in similar scenarios.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>