https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203648 The scope of a Port Authority's lien over third-party goods in public premises remained unresolved, as the order examined conflicting views on whether the Port Trust could detain, seize or sell such goods to recover rent from a lessee or unauthorised occupier. It noted one line of authority limiting the lien to goods on which charges had accrued, while another read the relevant provisions more broadly. Because the earlier conflicting view had not been considered in a later Division Bench decision, the matter was left for the Chief Justice to consider reference to a Larger Bench. No final ruling on the merits was given. en-us Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 May 2011 10:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203648 The scope of a Port Authority's lien over third-party goods in public premises remained unresolved, as the order examined conflicting views on whether the Port Trust could detain, seize or sell such goods to recover rent from a lessee or unauthorised occupier. It noted one line of authority limiting the lien to goods on which charges had accrued, while another read the relevant provisions more broadly. Because the earlier conflicting view had not been considered in a later Division Bench decision, the matter was left for the Chief Justice to consider reference to a Larger Bench. No final ruling on the merits was given. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203648