<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 368 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203644</link>
    <description>The court directed the authorities to retest Patchouli Oil samples for Patchouli Alcohol content at the Customs Central Research Laboratory in New Delhi, with costs borne by the petitioner. The retesting was allowed to ensure fairness and accuracy in determining the goods&#039; quality. The court emphasized following due process, upheld transparency, and justified the retesting based on principles of natural justice and legal precedent. The writ petition was disposed of with the petitioner granted liberty for further proceedings, and the respondents&#039; failure to file affidavits did not imply admission of allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 368 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203644</link>
      <description>The court directed the authorities to retest Patchouli Oil samples for Patchouli Alcohol content at the Customs Central Research Laboratory in New Delhi, with costs borne by the petitioner. The retesting was allowed to ensure fairness and accuracy in determining the goods&#039; quality. The court emphasized following due process, upheld transparency, and justified the retesting based on principles of natural justice and legal precedent. The writ petition was disposed of with the petitioner granted liberty for further proceedings, and the respondents&#039; failure to file affidavits did not imply admission of allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>