<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 149 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203632</link>
    <description>The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the additions made by the income tax authorities regarding interest income on advances and allowing the verification of the depreciation claim by the Assessing Officer. The court found no substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 149 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203632</link>
      <description>The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the additions made by the income tax authorities regarding interest income on advances and allowing the verification of the depreciation claim by the Assessing Officer. The court found no substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>