<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 264 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203626</link>
    <description>The High Court Bombay rejected the civil application seeking modification of an order to deposit two crores rupees by an appellant company, as the financial position of the company was precarious and its assets had been taken over by another company. The court found the application to be misconceived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 264 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203626</link>
      <description>The High Court Bombay rejected the civil application seeking modification of an order to deposit two crores rupees by an appellant company, as the financial position of the company was precarious and its assets had been taken over by another company. The court found the application to be misconceived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>