https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203623 The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with the Stay Order, as the appellants failed to provide a required Bank Guarantee. Allegations of improper availment of MODVAT Credit based on fake invoices resulted in duty confirmation and penalty imposition. The Tribunal referenced specific cases, leading to modification of Stay Orders and dispensing with pre-deposit conditions. Concerns about potential double duty demand were raised, advising appellants to address grievances with the original adjudicating authority. The case was remanded for de-novo adjudication in line with relevant judgments, resolving the Stay Petitions and appeals comprehensively. en-us Mon, 16 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203623 The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with the Stay Order, as the appellants failed to provide a required Bank Guarantee. Allegations of improper availment of MODVAT Credit based on fake invoices resulted in duty confirmation and penalty imposition. The Tribunal referenced specific cases, leading to modification of Stay Orders and dispensing with pre-deposit conditions. Concerns about potential double duty demand were raised, advising appellants to address grievances with the original adjudicating authority. The case was remanded for de-novo adjudication in line with relevant judgments, resolving the Stay Petitions and appeals comprehensively. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 16 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203623