<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 464 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203620</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of disallowance of Cenvat credit on improper documents for fresh consideration. It ruled in favor of the appellant on the disallowance of credit taken in respect of insurance charges, reversing the demand, penalties, and interest. The appellant was held liable for interest on availed Cenvat credit on capital goods and spares. Service tax demands not challenged were upheld with interest, but penalties were set aside. Service tax on auction proceeds of unclaimed cargo and charges for customs examination infrastructure were set aside. Amounts received from CONCOR were deemed not taxable under port services, with demands, penalties, and interest set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 464 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203620</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of disallowance of Cenvat credit on improper documents for fresh consideration. It ruled in favor of the appellant on the disallowance of credit taken in respect of insurance charges, reversing the demand, penalties, and interest. The appellant was held liable for interest on availed Cenvat credit on capital goods and spares. Service tax demands not challenged were upheld with interest, but penalties were set aside. Service tax on auction proceeds of unclaimed cargo and charges for customs examination infrastructure were set aside. Amounts received from CONCOR were deemed not taxable under port services, with demands, penalties, and interest set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>