<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 262 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that a prima facie case for a complete waiver of the amounts involved had not been established. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 5 lakhs within four weeks, considering the amount already paid. Compliance was required, and upon such compliance, the application for waiver of the balance amounts was allowed, and recovery stayed pending the appeal&#039;s final disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 262 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that a prima facie case for a complete waiver of the amounts involved had not been established. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 5 lakhs within four weeks, considering the amount already paid. Compliance was required, and upon such compliance, the application for waiver of the balance amounts was allowed, and recovery stayed pending the appeal&#039;s final disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>