<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 6 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203613</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the payment made by the assessee company towards CNG connection charges should be treated as revenue expenditure. The court emphasized that the payment was integral to the profit-earning process and did not confer enduring benefits to the assessee, as it did not grant any right or control over the gas facility. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the expenditure was for facilitating the manufacturing activity and not for acquiring a permanent asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 6 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203613</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the payment made by the assessee company towards CNG connection charges should be treated as revenue expenditure. The court emphasized that the payment was integral to the profit-earning process and did not confer enduring benefits to the assessee, as it did not grant any right or control over the gas facility. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the expenditure was for facilitating the manufacturing activity and not for acquiring a permanent asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>