<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 186 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203605</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax on specified input services used for exported goods required fresh consideration where exports were undisputed and the services fell within the relevant notification, but the claim was rejected for alleged lack of proper co-relation between the goods, services and tax paid. The appellant was entitled to produce additional supporting documents and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate to substantiate the claim. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original authority for a fresh decision after due hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 186 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203605</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax on specified input services used for exported goods required fresh consideration where exports were undisputed and the services fell within the relevant notification, but the claim was rejected for alleged lack of proper co-relation between the goods, services and tax paid. The appellant was entitled to produce additional supporting documents and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate to substantiate the claim. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original authority for a fresh decision after due hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>