<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 40 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203597</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s challenge to the rejection of a refund claim under Section 27 of the Act was dismissed by the appellate authority, citing non-challenge of assessment orders and the applicability of a Board&#039;s Circular. The original adjudicating authority and Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the rejection, emphasizing the importance of challenging assessment orders. The impact of a Supreme Court decision on refund consideration was pivotal in determining the outcome, leading to the dismissal of the appeal due to lack of merit based on legal precedent. Compliance with procedural requirements and judicial decisions in customs and excise matters was highlighted in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 40 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203597</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s challenge to the rejection of a refund claim under Section 27 of the Act was dismissed by the appellate authority, citing non-challenge of assessment orders and the applicability of a Board&#039;s Circular. The original adjudicating authority and Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the rejection, emphasizing the importance of challenging assessment orders. The impact of a Supreme Court decision on refund consideration was pivotal in determining the outcome, leading to the dismissal of the appeal due to lack of merit based on legal precedent. Compliance with procedural requirements and judicial decisions in customs and excise matters was highlighted in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>