<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 138 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203595</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It was determined that the duty had been paid on the goods received back for reconditioning, and the necessary procedures outlined in Trade Notice No.03-CE/2002 had been followed. As a result, the demand for duty and penalty imposed on the assessee was deemed unwarranted, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 138 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203595</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It was determined that the duty had been paid on the goods received back for reconditioning, and the necessary procedures outlined in Trade Notice No.03-CE/2002 had been followed. As a result, the demand for duty and penalty imposed on the assessee was deemed unwarranted, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>