<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 239 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203593</link>
    <description>For availing CENVAT credit, the recipient must take reasonable steps to verify the identity and existence of the supplier and satisfy the prescribed safeguards under the CENVAT Credit Rules. Internal alert circulars were treated as administrative communications and not as the source of statutory power, so proceedings were not invalid merely because they originated from such circulars. Because the factual basis regarding supplier existence and supporting documents was disputed, the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication, with suppression, misdeclaration and limitation left open for the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 239 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203593</link>
      <description>For availing CENVAT credit, the recipient must take reasonable steps to verify the identity and existence of the supplier and satisfy the prescribed safeguards under the CENVAT Credit Rules. Internal alert circulars were treated as administrative communications and not as the source of statutory power, so proceedings were not invalid merely because they originated from such circulars. Because the factual basis regarding supplier existence and supporting documents was disputed, the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication, with suppression, misdeclaration and limitation left open for the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>