<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 259 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected Revenue&#039;s appeal against the dropping of duty recovery by the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving alleged manufacturing activities at a premises. The Commissioner (Appeals) found lack of evidence to support Revenue&#039;s case and noted contradictions in Revenue&#039;s arguments. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, emphasizing that duty liability could not be imposed on the company based on Revenue&#039;s own allegations. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the setting aside of the duty demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 259 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected Revenue&#039;s appeal against the dropping of duty recovery by the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving alleged manufacturing activities at a premises. The Commissioner (Appeals) found lack of evidence to support Revenue&#039;s case and noted contradictions in Revenue&#039;s arguments. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, emphasizing that duty liability could not be imposed on the company based on Revenue&#039;s own allegations. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the setting aside of the duty demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>