<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 183 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203563</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned by the Tribunal due to bonafide reasons. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the disallowance under section 14A without applying Rule 8D, emphasizing that only actual expenditure related to earning exempt income should be disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 183 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203563</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned by the Tribunal due to bonafide reasons. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the disallowance under section 14A without applying Rule 8D, emphasizing that only actual expenditure related to earning exempt income should be disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>