<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 332 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203549</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, engaged in the production and export of tractors and tractor parts, in a case involving the admissibility of exemption under Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. The appellants successfully challenged the denial of exemption, with the Tribunal ruling that the impugned clearances were not liable to Special Additional Duty (SAD) and were not subject to MRP-based assessment. The Tribunal also held that the demand for duty was not sustainable, ordered the waiver of pre-deposit of dues adjudged against the appellant, and stayed the recovery pending the appeal decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 332 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203549</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, engaged in the production and export of tractors and tractor parts, in a case involving the admissibility of exemption under Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. The appellants successfully challenged the denial of exemption, with the Tribunal ruling that the impugned clearances were not liable to Special Additional Duty (SAD) and were not subject to MRP-based assessment. The Tribunal also held that the demand for duty was not sustainable, ordered the waiver of pre-deposit of dues adjudged against the appellant, and stayed the recovery pending the appeal decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>