<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 254 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203544</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal due to the rejection of the rectification application for being time-barred. The Revenue&#039;s cross objection was allowed as the rejection of the rectification application was upheld. The tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines and the consequences of failing to do so in seeking rectification under section 154 of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 07:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 254 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203544</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal due to the rejection of the rectification application for being time-barred. The Revenue&#039;s cross objection was allowed as the rejection of the rectification application was upheld. The tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines and the consequences of failing to do so in seeking rectification under section 154 of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>