<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 724 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203540</link>
    <description>HC held that where a company furnishes share subscription details and shareholders&#039; identities/addresses are undisputed, the company (assessee) is not obliged to prove the creditworthiness of those shareholders for cash credits. The onus lies on the tax department/Assessing Officer to investigate and establish whether the investors had the capacity to make the investments. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 724 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203540</link>
      <description>HC held that where a company furnishes share subscription details and shareholders&#039; identities/addresses are undisputed, the company (assessee) is not obliged to prove the creditworthiness of those shareholders for cash credits. The onus lies on the tax department/Assessing Officer to investigate and establish whether the investors had the capacity to make the investments. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>