<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 501 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203538</link>
    <description>The court directed the Joint Director to ensure re-credit in the DEPB license within a week to avoid further delays. It questioned the lack of adoption of an online system in Delhi for re-credit and instructed the Assistant Commissioner of Customs to align Delhi&#039;s system with Mumbai&#039;s for online processing. The court emphasized timely action to expedite re-credit and set a deadline for implementation, scheduling a follow-up hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 501 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203538</link>
      <description>The court directed the Joint Director to ensure re-credit in the DEPB license within a week to avoid further delays. It questioned the lack of adoption of an online system in Delhi for re-credit and instructed the Assistant Commissioner of Customs to align Delhi&#039;s system with Mumbai&#039;s for online processing. The court emphasized timely action to expedite re-credit and set a deadline for implementation, scheduling a follow-up hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>