<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 220 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203530</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal confirmed the service tax demand against the appellant for repair and maintenance services on transformers, imposing a penalty. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the classification of transformers and the plea of limitation were not accepted. The Tribunal remanded the case to examine if Central Excise duty paid on repaired transformers was for manufacturing, directing a detailed assessment of the service tax liability on repaired transformers treated as manufactured goods. All legal issues, including limitation, were open for reconsideration during the remand proceedings, emphasizing the importance of presenting all relevant arguments and evidence before adjudicating authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 220 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203530</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal confirmed the service tax demand against the appellant for repair and maintenance services on transformers, imposing a penalty. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the classification of transformers and the plea of limitation were not accepted. The Tribunal remanded the case to examine if Central Excise duty paid on repaired transformers was for manufacturing, directing a detailed assessment of the service tax liability on repaired transformers treated as manufactured goods. All legal issues, including limitation, were open for reconsideration during the remand proceedings, emphasizing the importance of presenting all relevant arguments and evidence before adjudicating authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>