<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 213 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203503</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on HR coils, MS plates, MS angles, MS channels and similar steel items was treated as admissible where the materials were factually found to have been used in fabricating a blending vessel and heating coil pipeline essential for manufacturing lubricating oils. The Tribunal noted concurrent findings on use in the manufacturing process and the absence of contrary evidence from the Revenue. It further observed that classification of the items under Chapter 72 did not, by itself, defeat credit once their use in fabrication of essential manufacturing equipment was established. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was therefore rejected and the credit order was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 213 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203503</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on HR coils, MS plates, MS angles, MS channels and similar steel items was treated as admissible where the materials were factually found to have been used in fabricating a blending vessel and heating coil pipeline essential for manufacturing lubricating oils. The Tribunal noted concurrent findings on use in the manufacturing process and the absence of contrary evidence from the Revenue. It further observed that classification of the items under Chapter 72 did not, by itself, defeat credit once their use in fabrication of essential manufacturing equipment was established. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was therefore rejected and the credit order was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>