<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 166 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203494</link>
    <description>The court held that the block assessment order dated 30.06.2005 was barred by limitation and without jurisdiction. The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned assessment order was quashed. The court emphasized that the last panchanamas dated 27.03.2003 and 28.03.2003 were the relevant dates for determining the conclusion of the search and the commencement of the limitation period for completing the block assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 166 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203494</link>
      <description>The court held that the block assessment order dated 30.06.2005 was barred by limitation and without jurisdiction. The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned assessment order was quashed. The court emphasized that the last panchanamas dated 27.03.2003 and 28.03.2003 were the relevant dates for determining the conclusion of the search and the commencement of the limitation period for completing the block assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>