<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 325 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203484</link>
    <description>At the pre-deposit stage, the Tribunal considered whether input service credit on services used for sales promotion, market research, storage and removal of export goods was prima facie admissible. On that limited examination, it waived the pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the disputed service tax, interest and penalty during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 09:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 325 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203484</link>
      <description>At the pre-deposit stage, the Tribunal considered whether input service credit on services used for sales promotion, market research, storage and removal of export goods was prima facie admissible. On that limited examination, it waived the pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the disputed service tax, interest and penalty during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>