<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 476 - ITAT, NEWDELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes on certain grounds, directing the assessee to provide evidence for member entry fees and swimming pool expenses. The Tribunal upheld the A.O.&#039;s disallowance of festival expenses and deductions under Section 44A(3), emphasizing the absence of required conditions. However, the Tribunal supported the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of ad-hoc disallowed telephone expenses. The Tribunal rejected the applicability of the principle of mutuality, expunging the CIT(A)&#039;s observation. Overall, matters were restored to the A.O. for fresh decisions on specific issues, maintaining the deletion of telephone expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 476 - ITAT, NEWDELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes on certain grounds, directing the assessee to provide evidence for member entry fees and swimming pool expenses. The Tribunal upheld the A.O.&#039;s disallowance of festival expenses and deductions under Section 44A(3), emphasizing the absence of required conditions. However, the Tribunal supported the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of ad-hoc disallowed telephone expenses. The Tribunal rejected the applicability of the principle of mutuality, expunging the CIT(A)&#039;s observation. Overall, matters were restored to the A.O. for fresh decisions on specific issues, maintaining the deletion of telephone expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>