<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 318 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203460</link>
    <description>Under Notification No. 30/2004-CE, the condition that no CENVAT credit be taken can be satisfied if the credit is later reversed, because reversal treats the credit as if it had not been availed. The timing of reversal is not decisive where the credit is effectively undone, including reversal made at the appellate stage. On that basis, the assessee was treated as having substantially complied with the exemption condition and was entitled to the exemption benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2015 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 318 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203460</link>
      <description>Under Notification No. 30/2004-CE, the condition that no CENVAT credit be taken can be satisfied if the credit is later reversed, because reversal treats the credit as if it had not been availed. The timing of reversal is not decisive where the credit is effectively undone, including reversal made at the appellate stage. On that basis, the assessee was treated as having substantially complied with the exemption condition and was entitled to the exemption benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>