<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 153 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203456</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (A) reduced the penalty imposed under Section 78 from Rs.3,14,842/- to 25% of the amount if paid within 30 days. The penalties under Sections 76 and 77 were set aside. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that no penalty should be imposed as they promptly paid the tax upon notification, believed they were exempt under the EXIM Policy, and were eligible for tax credits. The department&#039;s appeal for penalty enhancement was rejected, and the appellant&#039;s appeal against the sustained penalty was allowed, setting it aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 153 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203456</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (A) reduced the penalty imposed under Section 78 from Rs.3,14,842/- to 25% of the amount if paid within 30 days. The penalties under Sections 76 and 77 were set aside. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that no penalty should be imposed as they promptly paid the tax upon notification, believed they were exempt under the EXIM Policy, and were eligible for tax credits. The department&#039;s appeal for penalty enhancement was rejected, and the appellant&#039;s appeal against the sustained penalty was allowed, setting it aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>