<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 644 - ITAT, PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203452</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed for the disallowance of management service fees, and remanded the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the addition on account of interest income to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of bona fide claims and substantial evidence in penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 644 - ITAT, PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203452</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed for the disallowance of management service fees, and remanded the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the addition on account of interest income to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of bona fide claims and substantial evidence in penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>