<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 696 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203446</link>
    <description>EPCG import licence and concessional customs duty were held unavailable where the importer did not satisfy the prescribed past export performance criteria. The policy allowed registered manufacturer-exporters with at least three years of regular exports to claim the facility, while the amended public notice permitted only merit-based consideration for other manufacturers. The document states that a deemed licence could not arise merely because goods were imported and cleared under interim directions, and export obligation benefits depended on a valid licence from the competent authority. In the absence of eligibility, Customs was entitled to recover full duty, and the request for regularisation was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 696 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203446</link>
      <description>EPCG import licence and concessional customs duty were held unavailable where the importer did not satisfy the prescribed past export performance criteria. The policy allowed registered manufacturer-exporters with at least three years of regular exports to claim the facility, while the amended public notice permitted only merit-based consideration for other manufacturers. The document states that a deemed licence could not arise merely because goods were imported and cleared under interim directions, and export obligation benefits depended on a valid licence from the competent authority. In the absence of eligibility, Customs was entitled to recover full duty, and the request for regularisation was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>