<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 235 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the waiver of predeposit of duty and penalties to the appellant, staying the recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The decision favored the appellant, considering their role as coordinators with foundries in the manufacturing process of cast articles. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s argument that they did not transform the articles into new products but facilitated the manufacturing process. This ruling emphasized the significance of understanding manufacturing operations and legal definitions in excise matters, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant based on the classification of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 235 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the waiver of predeposit of duty and penalties to the appellant, staying the recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The decision favored the appellant, considering their role as coordinators with foundries in the manufacturing process of cast articles. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s argument that they did not transform the articles into new products but facilitated the manufacturing process. This ruling emphasized the significance of understanding manufacturing operations and legal definitions in excise matters, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant based on the classification of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>