<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 147 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed demands of service tax on GTA services due to the failure to provide necessary declarations and consignment notes, leading to tax liabilities for the assessees. Additionally, interest, penalties, and demands were imposed for non-compliance with documentation requirements. The denial of abatement benefits under Notification No. 32/2004-ST further reinforced the tax liabilities. The Tribunal rejected the plea on limitation, upholding the tax demands and penalties imposed by the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 147 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed demands of service tax on GTA services due to the failure to provide necessary declarations and consignment notes, leading to tax liabilities for the assessees. Additionally, interest, penalties, and demands were imposed for non-compliance with documentation requirements. The denial of abatement benefits under Notification No. 32/2004-ST further reinforced the tax liabilities. The Tribunal rejected the plea on limitation, upholding the tax demands and penalties imposed by the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>