<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 306 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203420</link>
    <description>The High Court acknowledged an error in deciding a case directly without referring questions of law back to the Tribunal as required by Section 35-H of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court allowed the review petition, recalling the judgment and restoring the Excise Reference for proper consideration. The High Court affirmed its jurisdiction to review orders and correct errors, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 306 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203420</link>
      <description>The High Court acknowledged an error in deciding a case directly without referring questions of law back to the Tribunal as required by Section 35-H of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court allowed the review petition, recalling the judgment and restoring the Excise Reference for proper consideration. The High Court affirmed its jurisdiction to review orders and correct errors, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>