<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 230 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203419</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order classifying the product under CETH 8419 and remanded the matter for reclassification under CETH 8437, in line with the Board Circular emphasizing the principal function of the machinery. The appeal was disposed of, stressing the importance of adhering to legal provisions for accurate classification, underscoring the significance of established guidelines and precedents in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 230 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203419</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order classifying the product under CETH 8419 and remanded the matter for reclassification under CETH 8437, in line with the Board Circular emphasizing the principal function of the machinery. The appeal was disposed of, stressing the importance of adhering to legal provisions for accurate classification, underscoring the significance of established guidelines and precedents in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>