<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 141 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203418</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the reduction of penalty amount from Rs.1,37,560/- to Rs.25,000/- by the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving confiscation of Valves &amp;amp; Cocks bearing the brand name &#039;KIRTI&#039;. The Tribunal found no substantial legal questions arising from the penalty reduction order and affirmed the decision based on the Central Excise Act provisions and relevant case law, including the principle that penalties should be equal to the evaded duty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 07:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 141 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203418</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the reduction of penalty amount from Rs.1,37,560/- to Rs.25,000/- by the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving confiscation of Valves &amp;amp; Cocks bearing the brand name &#039;KIRTI&#039;. The Tribunal found no substantial legal questions arising from the penalty reduction order and affirmed the decision based on the Central Excise Act provisions and relevant case law, including the principle that penalties should be equal to the evaded duty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>