<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 468 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203387</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of credit for service tax on wind mill services used in manufacturing excisable goods, based on established precedents and the services being situated away from the factory. The demand of duty amounting to Rs. 2,04,000 was set aside due to the limitation period being exceeded, with the Tribunal emphasizing the importance of adherence to such periods in tax matters. The demand of Rs. 59,328 was upheld, with penalties set aside based on the lack of mala fide intent on the appellant&#039;s part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 468 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203387</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of credit for service tax on wind mill services used in manufacturing excisable goods, based on established precedents and the services being situated away from the factory. The demand of duty amounting to Rs. 2,04,000 was set aside due to the limitation period being exceeded, with the Tribunal emphasizing the importance of adherence to such periods in tax matters. The demand of Rs. 59,328 was upheld, with penalties set aside based on the lack of mala fide intent on the appellant&#039;s part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>