https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203376 The High Court held that the rejection of the petitioner's application for an import license for marble blocks for the year 2010-11 was unjustified. Despite discrepancies in domestic sales turnover figures, the petitioner met the eligibility criteria and was entitled to the license. The Court quashed the rejection communications and directed the respondents to grant the license to the petitioner, emphasizing that the penalty imposed was unwarranted. The petition was allowed with no costs imposed. en-us Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203376 The High Court held that the rejection of the petitioner's application for an import license for marble blocks for the year 2010-11 was unjustified. Despite discrepancies in domestic sales turnover figures, the petitioner met the eligibility criteria and was entitled to the license. The Court quashed the rejection communications and directed the respondents to grant the license to the petitioner, emphasizing that the penalty imposed was unwarranted. The petition was allowed with no costs imposed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203376