<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 147 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203368</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of weighted deduction claimed by the assessee on scientific research under section 35(2AB), stating that only expenditures on in-house R&amp;amp;D facilities are eligible. Regarding the disallowance of expenses related to exempt income under section 14A, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and remanded the matter for re-examination in light of the Mumbai High Court&#039;s ruling that Rule 8D is not retrospective. The Tribunal also upheld the deletion of the estimated net profit addition, finding no justification for the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach. The final result was that the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, while the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 147 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203368</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of weighted deduction claimed by the assessee on scientific research under section 35(2AB), stating that only expenditures on in-house R&amp;amp;D facilities are eligible. Regarding the disallowance of expenses related to exempt income under section 14A, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and remanded the matter for re-examination in light of the Mumbai High Court&#039;s ruling that Rule 8D is not retrospective. The Tribunal also upheld the deletion of the estimated net profit addition, finding no justification for the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach. The final result was that the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, while the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>