<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 81 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203310</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of electric installations, air conditioners, and electric fans in a mill building as part of the plant and machinery, warranting a 25% depreciation rate. The decision was based on the assets&#039; contribution to business efficiency and aligned with a Supreme Court ruling interpreting &quot;plant&quot; broadly. The appeals challenging the higher depreciation rate were dismissed, affirming the assets&#039; inclusion in the plant category for depreciation purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 09:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 81 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203310</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of electric installations, air conditioners, and electric fans in a mill building as part of the plant and machinery, warranting a 25% depreciation rate. The decision was based on the assets&#039; contribution to business efficiency and aligned with a Supreme Court ruling interpreting &quot;plant&quot; broadly. The appeals challenging the higher depreciation rate were dismissed, affirming the assets&#039; inclusion in the plant category for depreciation purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>