<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 769 - ITAT, Channai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals filed by the revenue, upholding the exemption of reward amounts received by an informer from Customs under section 10(17A) of the Income-tax Act. The decision emphasized the importance of maintaining informer secrecy and treating rewards as payments for information in the national interest. The judgment highlighted the parallel treatment of rewards for informers and income-tax personnel under relevant sections of the Act, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 769 - ITAT, Channai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals filed by the revenue, upholding the exemption of reward amounts received by an informer from Customs under section 10(17A) of the Income-tax Act. The decision emphasized the importance of maintaining informer secrecy and treating rewards as payments for information in the national interest. The judgment highlighted the parallel treatment of rewards for informers and income-tax personnel under relevant sections of the Act, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>